Key result
A 5-level CPET risk score predicts ~55% higher all-cause mortality in cardiac rehab patients.
Why the study?
CPET provides established prognostic markers, but simple, practical CPET-based tools for risk stratification in patients entering cardiac rehabilitation are lacking.
Does a 5-level cumulative CPET-based risk score predict all-cause mortality in patients entering cardiac rehabilitation?
Cohort (n=476)
Does a 5-level cumulative CPET-based risk score predict all-cause mortality in patients entering cardiac rehabilitation?
Hazard Ratio: 1.551 (95% CI 1.16–2.075)
p-value: p=0.003
A simple 5-point risk score based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters independently predicts all-cause mortality in patients entering cardiac rehabilitation.
The score may refine mortality risk stratification beyond standard markers; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides multiple physiologic markers with established prognostic relevance. However, simple, practical CPET-based tools for risk stratification in patients entering cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are lacking. Aim To identify CPET parameters associated with all-cause mortality and develop a cumulative, clinically applicable CPET-based risk score. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients enrolled in a CR program who underwent CPET prior to CR initiation. Clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and CPET data were collected from patients’ records. CPET variables associated with lower survival were identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine optimal thresholds. A cumulative score (0–5) was constructed by assigning one point per abnormal CPET parameter. Survival was assessed with Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results Among 476 patients (mean age 61 years; 80% male; 84% ischemic heart disease), 67% had hypertension, 27% diabetes, 70% dyslipidemia, and 61% a history of smoking. Median serum creatinine and NT-proBNP were 0.93 mg/dL and 460 pg/mL, respectively; mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 50%. Over a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, 20 deaths occurred. Five CPET parameters were associated with lower survival: peak VO2 <11.7 mL·kg−¹·min−¹, percent-predicted peak VO2 <57%, PETCO2 <31 mmHg, VE/VCO2 slope >32, and ventilatory power <5.7 (HR 2.5). The cumulative CPET score demonstrated good discrimination for mortality (AUC 0.709); a score ≥3 identified patients with significantly reduced survival (log-rank p<0.001). In multivariate Cox regression, the score remained an independent predictor of all-cause mortality after adjusting for LVEF, age, NT-proBNP, eGFR, and cardiovascular risk factors (HR 1.551, 95% CI 1.160–2.075, p=0.003). Conclusions A simple additive score derived from five CPET parameters measured before CR initiation provides strong prognostic discrimination for all-cause mortality and may serve as a practical tool for risk stratification in cardiac rehabilitation candidates.For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients entering cardiac rehabilitation (n=476). Cumulative CPET-based risk score vs. Lower score was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.551, 95% CI 1.160-2.075, p=0.003). A cumulative 5-level CPET-based risk score independently predicted all-cause mortality in patients entering cardiac rehabilitation (HR 1.551; 95% CI 1.160-2.075; p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: