Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism is a serious complication in cancer patients, prompting an evaluation of the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared to LMWHs in treating cancer-associated VTE.
Does rivaroxaban reduce VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality compared to LMWH in adults with cancer-associated VTE?
Comparison
Rivaroxaban vs LMWHs
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Key result
Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of VTE recurrence (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99; P=0.03) and all-cause mortality compared to LMWH in adults with cancer-associated VTE.
Authors
Loading...
May favor rivaroxaban over LMWH to reduce VTE recurrence in cancer patients; leaves open practice change pending confirmatory RCTs.
Meta-Analysis (n=19,153)
Does rivaroxaban reduce VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality compared to LMWH in adults with cancer-associated VTE?
Relative Risk: 0.88 (95% CI 0.78–0.99)
p-value: p=0.03
In adults with cancer-associated VTE, rivaroxaban significantly reduces VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality compared to LMWH.
Adnan et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (n=19,153). Rivaroxaban vs. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) was evaluated on VTE recurrence (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99, p=0.03). Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of VTE recurrence (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99; P=0.03) and all-cause mortality compared to LMWH in adults with cancer-associated VTE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: