Key result
TTE-detected PFO is linked to ~145% higher odds of white-matter hyperintensities versus controls.
Why the study?
Pooled effect sizes linking PFO to white-matter hyperintensities do not clarify applicability to routine TTE or provide patient-level risk estimates.
Does the presence of TTE-detected PFO associate with increased risk of MRI-defined white-matter hyperintensities in adults?
Observational (n=149)
No
Does the presence of TTE-detected PFO associate with increased risk of MRI-defined white-matter hyperintensities in adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In routine TTE-defined PFO populations, the association with white-matter hyperintensities is preserved, suggesting incidental PFO may mark early subclinical cerebral injury.
Background: Meta-analyses suggest an association between patent foramen ovale (PFO) and white-matter hyperintensities (WMH), but pooled effect sizes do not clarify applicability to routine transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or provide patient-level risk estimates. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between TTE-detected PFO and MRI-defined WMH in routine practice and to develop a practice-anchored framework (PAMAP) that translates literature-derived evidence into individualized risk. Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center, propensity-matched analysis of 149 adults undergoing TTE and brain MRI (37 PFO-positive, 112 controls). The primary endpoint was WMH (Fazekas ≥ 1). PAMAP synthesized 12 studies; 4 eligible studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis to derive a locked shunt coefficient (OR 3.65). The locked model used age and shunt (H); embolic context (E), and atrial stress (A) were neutral until refit. Transportability was assessed at the cohort level (expected vs. observed prevalence) and patient level (calibration, discrimination), followed by a minimal prespecified refit. Results: WMH was more frequent in PFO-positive versus control participants (54% vs. 32%). Literature-based expected prevalence approximated observed prevalence, supporting transportability. The locked model showed acceptable performance (calibration intercept 0.106; slope 0.912; Brier 0.188; AUC 0.756). A parsimonious refit improved performance (Brier 0.176; AUC 0.783), with the shunt term remaining significant (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.23–4.88). Conclusions: PAMAP translates meta-analytic associations into a transportable patient-level risk framework. In routine TTE-defined PFO populations, the WMH association is preserved, suggesting that incidental PFO may mark early subclinical cerebral injury and enabling calibrated, individualized risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roytberg et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Patent foramen ovale (n=149). Patent foramen ovale vs. Controls (no PFO) was evaluated on White-matter hyperintensities (Fazekas ≥ 1) (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.23-4.88). TTE-detected patent foramen ovale was associated with a higher frequency of white-matter hyperintensities compared to controls (54% vs. 32%; OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.23-4.88).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: