Anticoagulant therapy alone showed a non-significant trend toward higher MACCEs risk compared to intensified antithrombotic therapy (HR 1.47) in patients with atrial fibrillation and CHD after PCI.
Cohort (n=1,062)
Yes
How do different antithrombotic regimens affect clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease undergoing PCI?
In patients with AF and CHD undergoing PCI, intensified antithrombotic therapy reduced thromboembolic and cardiac events compared to anticoagulant monotherapy, but increased bleeding risk compared to antiplatelet therapy.
Hazard Ratio: 1.47 (95% CI 0.97–2.24)
p-value: p=0.073
Atrial fibrillation (AF) with coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) — including both acute and chronic presentations — is common, yet the optimal antithrombotic regimen remains unclear. This study aimed to characterize clinical features, current antithrombotic therapy, and discharge prognosis in this population. Data were collected from three independent annual cohorts of patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease undergoing PCI (2013, 2018, and 2023). First, cross-sectional comparisons across the three years were performed to examine temporal trends in clinical characteristics and discharge antithrombotic therapy. Predictors of discharge antithrombotic therapy were then analyzed in the 2023 cohort. Second, the 2023 cohort was prospectively followed for a median of 17 months (interquartile range 9–24 months; range 0.5–32 months) to evaluate clinical outcomes according to different antithrombotic regimens and to identify independent risk factors. Of the 1,062 participants, 479 underwent longitudinal follow-up (median 17 months, IQR 9–24; range 0.5–32). Independent predictors of intensified antithrombotic therapy included recent PCI, proton pump inhibitor use, and statin use; independent predictors of antiplatelet therapy included recent PCI, age, liver dysfunction, left atrial diameter, proton pump inhibitor use, heart failure, and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. During follow-up, anticoagulant therapy showed a trend toward higher MACCEs risk compared with intensified antithrombotic therapy (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.97–2.24, P =0.073) and antiplatelet therapy (HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.79–2.22, P =0.280), with no significant difference between the latter two (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.71–1.88, P =0.567). Multivariate Cox regression identified liver dysfunction, diabetes, and HAS-BLED score as independently associated with MACCEs, while higher hemoglobin and statin use were associated with lower risk. Over the years, more AF with CHD patients after PCI received post-discharge antithrombotic therapy. Liver dysfunction, diabetes, and a high HAS‑BLED score were independently associated with MACCEs, while statin use was associated with lower risks of all‑cause death, MI, and ischemia‑driven revascularization.
Bao et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1,062). Anticoagulant therapy vs. Intensified antithrombotic therapy was evaluated on MACCEs (Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events) (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.97-2.24, p=0.073). Anticoagulant therapy alone showed a non-significant trend toward higher MACCEs risk compared to intensified antithrombotic therapy (HR 1.47) in patients with atrial fibrillation and CHD after PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: