Key result
Slow-paced breathing enhances vagal activity, with optimal respiratory periods delayed in patients with reduced FEV1.
Why the study?
The methodology of slow-paced breathing to optimize cardiorespiratory function requires further refinement.
Does slow-paced breathing with biofeedback improve heart rate variability in healthy young adults with optimal and suboptimal spirometric indices?
Cross-Sectional (n=28)
Does slow-paced breathing with biofeedback improve heart rate variability in healthy young adults with optimal and suboptimal spirometric indices?
The optimal frequency for slow-paced breathing to enhance vagal tone depends on baseline spirometric indices, with different resonance frequencies observed in individuals with optimal versus suboptimal FEV1.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spirometry may guide individualized resonance breathing periods for HRV optimization in young adults; extends prior work to lung function subgroups.
Background: The methodology of slow-paced breathing (SPB) to optimize cardiorespiratory function requires further refinement. The aim of this study was to identify the methodological ranges of resonance breathing frequencies during SPB in healthy young adults with optimal and suboptimal spirometric indices. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy Indian students living in the Arctic Russian region (age 21–24 years; 20 males, 8 females) underwent spirometry and 2 min HRV recordings at 6 time points: baseline (spontaneous breathing) and SPB periods of 9–13 s with biofeedback. Results: Participants were divided into Group 1 (FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted, n = 13) and Group 2 (FEV1 < 80% predicted, n = 15). At baseline, Group 2 showed reduced overall HRV, lower vagal activity, a higher stress index and lower baroreflex power (by LFmx) vs. Group 1. During SPB, Group 1 exhibited more significant vagal enhancement, peaking at 9–10 s breathing periods. Group 2 showed delayed, wave-like responses with peak effects at 9 s and/or 12–13 s. Conclusions: SPB frequency depends on the level of FEV1: 9–10 s periods in individuals with FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted, and 9 s and/or 12–13 s periods (delayed effect) in those with FEV1 < 80% predicted, which may be due to cardiorespiratory strain under uncomfortable climatic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Поскотинова et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy young individuals (n=28). Slow-paced breathing (SPB) vs. Spontaneous breathing (baseline) was evaluated on Heart rate variability (HRV) and vagal activity. Slow-paced breathing produced optimal vagal enhancement at 9-10 s periods in individuals with FEV1 ≥80% predicted, whereas those with FEV1 <80% showed delayed peak effects at 9 s and/or 12-13 s.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: