Key result
T1 and T2 mapping provide a robust, quantifiable imaging application with unique potential for objective non-invasive disease recognition and treatment discovery in myocarditis.
Why the study?
Does T1 and T2 mapping improve non-invasive disease recognition in patients with myocarditis compared to Lake Louise criteria and histopathology?
Does T1 and T2 mapping improve non-invasive disease recognition in patients with myocarditis compared to Lake Louise criteria and histopathology?
T1 and T2 mapping represent a step-change in the non-invasive diagnosis of myocarditis, offering quantifiable and robust alternatives to traditional Lake Louise criteria and biopsy.
INTRODUCTION: Myocarditis and its sequelae remain an unconquered clinical problem, disproportionately affecting the young. Several hurdles beset myocarditis, including non-specific symptoms, heterogeneous clinical presentation, dynamic disease stages, underscored by an absence of an easy diagnostic test or a specific treatment. Areas covered: The current diagnostic means are poorly equipped to counter the challenge; the gold standard by invasive endomyocardial biopsy relies on availability of expert procedural and reading skill. The tissue diagnostic criteria were developed to improve readers agreement with clinical diagnosis, and not based on evidence for differential treatment or improved prognosis. The Lake-Louise Criteria represented a first step towards a non-invasive diagnosis. They require extensive imaging, which is insufficiently robust with poor diagnostic confidence and tissue pathophysiological validation; they similarly lack evidence of improved outcome by guiding clinical management. T1 and T2 mapping are a step-change, providing robust, short and quantifiable imaging application, which can veritably reflect the dynamic and heterogeneous underlying disease. Expert commentary: T1 and T2 mapping harbours a unique potential for an objective non-invasive disease recognition and treatment discovery in myocarditis. These measures should enter independently into clinical experimentation, with a high priority for outcome and therapeutic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Püntmann et al. (2018) conducted a review in Myocarditis. T1 and T2 mapping vs. Lake-Louise Criteria and histopathology was evaluated. T1 and T2 mapping provide a robust, quantifiable imaging application with unique potential for objective non-invasive disease recognition and treatment discovery in myocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: