Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines properties of hydraulic silicate sealers, indicating variability in composition and performance.
Introduction Pre-mixed root canal sealers containing hydraulic silicate cements are marketed under the “bioceramic” umbrella term. Eight such sealers were investigated to get a comprehensive overview. Materials and methods Disclosure of composition was assessed in safety data sheets and instructions for use. Elemental analysis was conducted using energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Flowability, radiopacity, and setting time were tested according to ISO norm 6876 (2012). Knoop hardness was tested after 7 d. Samples were immersed in phosphate-buffered saline for up to 28 d and assessed for continued pH induction and release of calcium ions (Ca), which was measured using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Cumulative aluminum (Al) leaching after 28 d was quantified using AAS. Results Dispersing agents were not disclosed in 5 of the 8 sealers, and cement components not specified in 4. As assessed by EDS, 4 of the sealers under investigation were Portland cement-related, and 4 were Al-free silicates. The ISO-requested flowability and radiopacity were met by all the sealers. Radiopacity ranged from 3.4 ± 0.1 to 7.4 ± 0.3 mm Al. Setting time ranged from 122 ± 4 min to 4,258 ± 14 min. The sealers containing Al tended to set quicker and reached a considerably higher 7-d hardness than their Al-free counterparts. All sealers maintained an alkaline pH induction over 28 d, but differed in Ca release. Al leaching was observed with 2 of the 4 Portland cement-related sealers, but to a different degree. Conclusion The materials under investigation differed considerably in their basic properties and their propensity to leach elements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kapralos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: