Prospective non-randomized study compares outcomes of two osteotomy techniques in children with cubitus varus, suggesting both are effective.
Introduction: Cubitus varus is a delayed complication of neglected supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Both oblique closing-wedge and modified step-cut osteotomies are widely used corrective techniques, but prospective comparative data are limited. Materials and Methods: In this prospective non-randomized comparative study, 30 patients with cubitus varus deformity were divided into two groups: Oblique closing-wedge osteotomy (Group 1, n = 15) and modified step-cut osteotomy (Group 2, n = 15). Radiological correction was assessed using carrying angle, and functional outcomes were evaluated using elbow flexion- extension arc, prono-supination arc, and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). Radiological union time was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test and Chi-square test. Results: The mean age was 14.9 ± 2.7 years, with comparable baseline characteristics between groups (P = 0.741). Both groups showed significant deformity correction, with mean post-operative carrying angles of 13.0° ± 4.9° and 11.5° ± 5.6°, respectively (P = 0.432). The mean MEPS was 88.0 ± 7.8 in Group 1 and 90.0 ± 8.7 in Group 2 (P = 0.511). Elbow flexion extension arc, prono-supination arc, and union time were similar between groups (P > 0.05). Both the osteotomies achieved radiological union. The mean follow-up duration was 14.2 ± 2.8 months. Conclusion: Both oblique closing-wedge and modified step-cut osteotomies provide effective correction of cubitus varus with comparable radiological and functional outcomes. Both techniques are safe and reliable options in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahoo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: