Narrative review explores psychological impacts of botulinum toxin on emotional and psychiatric outcomes.
Background Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is widely used in aesthetic dermatology, particularly for dynamic wrinkles in the upper facial third. Beyond cosmetic effects, BoNT-A may influence emotional processing through the skin-brain axis. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on psychological and psychiatric outcomes of upper facial BoNT-A treatment, with a focus on mechanisms extending beyond aesthetics. Methods A structured search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through January 2026. Search terms included “botulinum toxin,” “upper facial third,” “psychodermatology,” “facial feedback,” “depression,” “anxiety,” and “psychiatric disorders.” Original studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses assessing psychological, psychiatric, or neurobiological outcomes were included. Results Upper facial BoNT-A is associated with clinically meaningful reductions in depressive and anxiety symptoms, and improvements in self-perception and social functioning. Inhibition of corrugator and procerus muscles modulates afferent signaling to limbic structures, supporting the facial feedback hypothesis. Neuroimaging evidence demonstrates attenuated amygdala activation after BoNT-A treatment. Psychosocial improvements may reinforce these neurobiological effects. Evidence in bipolar disorder and personality disorders remains limited and methodologically heterogeneous. Caution is advised in patients with body dysmorphic disorder. Conclusions BoNT-A in the upper facial third provides psychodermatological benefits beyond aesthetics, improving emotional regulation and affective symptoms. It should be considered a complementary intervention within a biopsychosocial framework. Future large-scale RCTs with standardized psychiatric and neurobiological endpoints are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loewen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: