Investigates ammonia production in water using nanosecond pulsed plasma jets, suggesting improved efficiency for low-carbon processes.
Developing energy-efficient technologies for carbon-neutral ammonia (NH 3 ) synthesis is critical for decentralized fertilizer production and global decarbonization. This study investigates generating NH 3 from water using a nanosecond pulsed atmospheric pressure plasma jet (ns‑APPJ) operating in either N₂ or dry air. The plasma jet reactor employed approximately 250 ns, up-to-22 kV pulses at 500 Hz to sustain a nonequilibrium discharge impinging directly on static liquid water. The kinetics, energy efficiency, and product selectivity of NH 3 formation were quantified as functions of the pulse voltage, repetition frequency (PRF), and gas flow rate. NH 3 production increased linearly with treatment time and scaled strongly with pulse voltage, reaching a maximum of 0.0345 mg h⁻¹ at 22 kV. Even at higher voltages, the production of NH 3 was more favorable than oxidative nitrogen species (i.e., NO 2 - and NO 3 - ), with the NH 3 selectivity increasing from 25% at 17 kV to 85% at 22 kV. Reducing the PRF improved energy efficiency but decreased production rates, while lower gas flow rates enhanced NH 3 formation, suggesting increased residence time and improved plasma–liquid mass transport. Optical emission spectroscopy revealed dominant N 2 (C–B) emissions, confirming that electron impact excitation is important for NH 3 formation. Despite modest production rates relative to other plasma–liquid systems, the reactor operated on a low average power (< 3 W) and maintained liquid temperatures below 41 °C, demonstrating a strongly nonthermal process. This work established a baseline for ns‑APPJ‑driven NH 3 synthesis and identified the key operating parameters for optimizing the reaction efficiency. The findings highlight the potential of nanosecond pulsed plasma strategies for localized, low‑carbon NH 3 production and encourage designing reactors that incorporate flowing liquid architectures to enhance the yield.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caudell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: