Assesses diaphragm function in early-stage Parkinson’s disease, highlighting preservation despite motor impairment.
Background Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder associated with respiratory dysfunction, including inspiratory muscle weakness that contributes to morbidity and mortality. Despite this, the contributory role of the diaphragm remains unclear. This study assessed diaphragm thickness and contractility during tidal breathing in early-stage PD compared with matched controls using ultrasound imaging. Methods Twelve participants with early-stage PD (mean age 66.75+/-8.07 years, mean disease duration 5.33+/-5.6 years, Hoehn and Yahr stage 2), and twelve matched controls were assessed. Ultrasound measures included diaphragm thickness at end expiration (Tdi exp ), end inspiration (Tdi insp ), and contractile thickness (Tdi insp -Tdi exp ). Contractility was evaluated using thickening ratio (DT r ), thickening fraction (DT f ), and contraction speed (mm/sec). Dyspnoea and respiratory disability were assessed using self-report and the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. Correlations between diaphragm measures, motor severity using the MDS-UPDRS, and disease duration were explored. Results Dyspnoea prevalence and mMRC scores were significantly higher in PD participants. Despite this, no significant between-group differences were observed for Tdi exp (PD: 3.2+/-0.77 mm; versus matched-controls: 3.01+/-0.57 mm) or Tdi insp (PD: 4.27+/-0.95 mm versus 4.14+/-1.06 mm) with small effect sizes. DTr and DTf were comparable between groups. Contractile thickness was lower (mean difference 0.03 mm), and contraction speed slower (mean difference 0.03 mm/sec), in PD with small effect sizes noted. No notable relationships between measures and PD disease duration were observed. Conclusions Diaphragm thickness and contractility appear maintained in early-stage PD despite increased dyspnoea. Further investigation in larger longitudinal studies across all PD stages and subtypes is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McMahon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: