Review compares SBRT and RFA for treating inoperable liver metastases, highlighting implications for clinical decisions.
Localized treatment of oligometastatic liver disease can improve both local control and survival. The liver is a frequent site of metastases from colorectal, breast, and lung cancers, but most patients are not eligible for surgical resection due to lesion number, location, or comorbidities. For these patients, non-surgical ablative methods such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and increasingly microwave ablation (MWA) are used. RFA was used as the primary comparator in this review because it represents the most historically established and widely reported ablative modality in the comparative radiotherapy literature. While RFA has been the traditional approach, SBRT is emerging as a promising alternative, offering precise, non-invasive treatment. SBRT may be especially useful for larger lesions or tumors in locations where RFA is difficult to perform. However, high-quality evidence and large-scale trials are still needed to confirm its efficacy and define its role. This review compares the strengths and limitations of both methods and provides practical guidance for clinical decision-making in the treatment of patients with inoperable liver metastases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atalar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: