Randomized trial explores C-peptide effects on complications in type 1 diabetes, indicating its role in reducing risks.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize associations of C-peptide measurements with type 1 diabetes (T1D) complications across long-term clinical follow-up in a large representative population cohort (Scottish Diabetes Research Network Type 1 Bioresource [SDRNT1BIO]). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: SDRNT1BIO includes people with a clinical diagnosis of T1D who are aged 16 years or older at enrollment. Their median diabetes duration is 21 (interquartile range = 11-31) years. C-peptide was measured in an untimed blood sample using the Roche immunoassay with a lower limit of detection of 3 pmol/L. Incident events and continuous outcomes were captured through electronic health record linkage across follow-up. Associations were studied using Poisson generalized linear models and linear mixed models adjusted for sex, age, time-updated T1D duration, year of entry, and age/T1D duration interaction. RESULTS: Participants (n = 5,630) were followed for a median of 10.8 years. Inverse associations were found between baseline C-peptide level and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (P < 0.0001; no. of events = 1,015), severe hospitalized hypoglycemia (SHH) (P = 0.0055; n = 539), and incident retinopathy (P < 0.0001; n = 1,172). These associations persisted when adjusted for time-updated glycosylated hemoglobin. No associations were found between baseline C-peptide levels and cardiovascular disease (P = 0.9; n = 714) or death (P = 0.8; n = 566). In a subset of participants (n = 407) with serial C-peptide measures, follow-up C-peptide level was inversely associated with risk for DKA (P < 0.001; n = 92) and there was a borderline association with SHH (P = 0.015; n = 28). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the importance of C-peptide level and its maintenance for glycemic control and avoidance of acute and chronic complications of T1D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mellor et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: