Erratum acknowledges contributions of Galina Babak in reintroducing Aizenshtok's work, enhancing literary heritage.
Erratum for “Ieremiah Aizenshtok Between OPOIAS and Ukrainian Formalism: ‘Ten Years of “OPOIAZ”’(1927),” introduced, translated, and annotated by Andrey Ustinov. Poetics Today 46, nos. 3–4 (2025): 603-622.I would like to acknowledge that it was the Ukrainian scholar Galina Babak who recently reintroduced the works of Ieremiah Aizenshtok to a larger academic community. Her publications have foregrounded archival materials and research that have been overlooked or marginalized for far too long. In particular, Dr. Babak's translation of Aizenshtok's “Ten Years of ‘OPOYAZ’” (1927) from Ukrainian to Russian in 2021 and her discussion of Aizenshtok's participation in the Kharkiv Circle of Formalists in the 1920s have generated significant interest in Aizenshtok's legacy—see, for example, an Aizenshtok cluster that Dr. Babak guest-edited for the Matica Srpska Journal of Slavic Studies (2022, vol. 101) and our joint article in the Vienna Slavic Yearbook (2022, vol. 10).I would like to thank Dr. Babak again for her important contributions to Ukrainian formalism studies, for our past collaboration, and for the generous support she provided during my translation of Aizenshtok's “Ten Years” for publication in this volume.—Andrey Ustinov
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: