Evaluates kisspeptin levels as a biomarker in early pregnancy loss, suggesting its utility in personalized healthcare.
Background: Precision medicine aims to improve early, individualized risk stratification using biologically relevant biomarkers. In early pregnancy, markers reflecting placental function remain limited. Kisspeptin, a placentally derived peptide that rises during normal gestation, has emerged as a potential indicator of pregnancy viability. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate evidence on maternal serum kisspeptin levels and placental KISS1/KISS1R expression in early pregnancy loss, and to assess its potential relevance as a precision biomarker within personalized pharmacy and individualized monitoring frameworks. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (up to 2025) was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies assessing circulating kisspeptin and/or placental expression in early pregnancy loss versus viable pregnancies were included. A formal meta-analysis was not performed due to substantial heterogeneity in study design, biological material, assay methods, gestational age, and outcome reporting formats. Under these conditions, quantitative pooling was considered methodologically inappropriate; therefore, qualitative synthesis was performed. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Most reported significantly lower maternal serum kisspeptin levels in early pregnancy loss, with good discriminatory accuracy. Immunohistochemical analyses showed reduced placental and choriodecidual KISS1/KISS1R expression in miscarriage and recurrent pregnancy loss, indicating disrupted local signaling. Concordant systemic and tissue findings suggest that circulating kisspeptin reflects placental dysfunction. Conclusions: Kisspeptin appears to be a promising precision biomarker for monitoring early pregnancy viability and supporting individualized pharmaceutical care. Standardized assays and large prospective studies are needed before routine clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paunova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: