Randomized trial shows varying associations of air pollution with ischaemic stroke risk across life stages, suggesting genetic influence.
Background Air pollution exposure has been linked to ischaemic stroke (IS), yet the sensitive life stages for pollution-related IS risk and the interplay of genetic susceptibility remain unclear. Methods We analysed 404 234 IS-free participants from a large UK prospective cohort. Exposures to PM 2.5 , SO 2 and O 3 were estimated across five life stages (toddlerhood, childhood, adolescence, youth and middle-aged to older adulthood) and cumulatively from birth. Bayesian life-course models identified sensitive exposure windows and quantile g-computation estimated mixture effects. Gene–environment interactions with polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were evaluated using relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), attributable proportion (AP) and synergy index (S). Results During a median follow-up of 13.6 years, 8130 IS cases occurred. Associations between air pollutants and IS varied by life stage, with stronger associations observed in middle-aged to older adulthood (HRs: 1.586 (95% CI 1.554 to 1.618) for PM 2.5 , 1.180 (1.167–1.193) for SO 2 , 1.588 (1.552–1.624) for O 3 ). For cumulative exposures, elevated risks were seen from toddlerhood to older adulthood (HRs: 1.139–1.313). Mixture effects were most pronounced in toddlerhood (HR=2.829, 95% CI 2.623 to 3.052), largely driven by SO 2 (weight=0.500). Bayesian life-course models suggested PM 2.5 (25.2%) and O 3 (24.5%) had greater relative contributions in childhood and adolescence whereas SO 2 (45.9%) contributed more in later life. Higher pollutant exposure and elevated PRS were associated with higher IS risk (RERI>0, AP>0 and S>1). Conclusions Air pollution associations with IS risk vary across life stages and may be influenced by genetic susceptibility, supporting a life-course prevention approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: