Cross-sectoral study reveals how U.S. engagement impacts Chinese investment, indicating strategic dynamics.
How does U.S. commercial and political engagement in a developing country impact Chinese strategic investment decisions? How does this impact vary across conventional and high- tech sectors? Drawing on previous literature in International Relations and International Political Economy (IPE), I developed and tested three different theories in this essay: 1) great power competition theory and full-out competition; 2) IPE and comparative advantage theory; 3) selective competition theory. Through a gravity model of trade and a novel data set, I find support for the third theory: existing U.S. investments in a conventional sector in a host country diminish Chinese investment incentives. In contrast, U.S. investments in technology-intensive sectors stimulate Chinese investments, resulting in higher congruence in location choices. Geo- strategically, a closer political relationship between the U.S. and a host country decreases Chinese investments, but greater U.S. military involvement in that country stimulates Chinese investment incentives. I argue the higher congruence in U.S.-China foreign investments in a high-tech sector stem from China's desire to challenge the technological dominance of the United States and its leadership role in the global industrial standards-setting regime. This study contributes to the current literature in international political economy on the determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment (OFDI).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tianyu Qiao (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: