Quantifying the impact of tropical cyclones on precipitation variability in Northern South America, suggesting significant regional hydrometeorological effects.
Assessing the contribution of tropical cyclones to regional precipitation variability is essential for understanding the associated hydrometeorological benefits and risks. This study quantifies the contribution of tropical cyclones to annual precipitation in the northernmost part of South America from 2016 to 2025, utilizing data from surface rain gauges. Simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, configured with 2 km grid spacing and 38 vertical levels, estimate the influence of relative humidity at 850 hPa and ambient temperature at 500 hPa on precipitation over the continental region when each convective system is nearest to the coastline. During Hurricanes Matthew (2016) and Melissa (2025), contributions to the annual average precipitation reached 51% and 47%, respectively, with the highest values observed near the northern South American coastline. The contributions of Harvey (2017), Iota (2020), Julia (2022), and Beryl (2024) to annual precipitation were 0–26%, 0–18%, 0–12%, and 0–19%, respectively. Precipitation distribution was heterogeneous during the passage of tropical storms. The extent of accumulated precipitation was influenced by the cyclone’s trajectory and proximity to mountainous regions. Patterns of relative humidity at 850 hPa did not correspond to a uniform precipitation distribution. Between 6% and 30% of rain gauges did not record precipitation during the analyzed tropical cyclone events. These findings highlight that tropical cyclone-induced precipitation is strongly influenced by complex interactions between atmospheric dynamics and topography. Future research should assess the contributions of these systems to groundwater and surface reservoirs that support indigenous communities in rural areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arregocés et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: