Compares keratin and collagen bioinks for corneal stroma, suggesting keratin's viability.
Corneal blindness remains a major clinical challenge, yet donor grafts are scarce. Bioprinting has emerged in recent decades to potentially overcome donor shortage. In bioprinting, collagen is a common biomaterial. However, one alternative biomaterial, which has shown promising results in corneal tissue engineering, is keratin. Therefore, human hair keratin was investigated in this study as a bioink component for stroma bioprinting. Two keratin preparations, an aqueous extraction and an alkaline extraction, were incorporated into a methacrylated hyaluronic acid bioink and compared with a collagen methacrylated hyaluronic acid bioink. Corneal stroma-like constructs were printed by extrusion bioprinting and evaluated for optical transmission, biomechanical properties, cell compatibility and protein expression of collagen type I and alpha-smooth muscle actin over a four-week period. Two different cell types, immortalized corneal keratocytes and human corneal fibroblasts, were used. The alkaline keratin dialysate-supplemented bioink showed similar optical transparency and biomechanical properties to the collagen-supplemented bioink. Cell viability was high in all formulations. Protein expression of collagen type I and α-smooth muscle actin remained low in all bioinks. Human corneal fibroblasts appeared to be in a quiescent state and were unable to produce large amounts of collagen. This comparative study between collagen and keratin is a first step towards establishing keratins in bioprinting, leading to more complex bioinks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balters et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: