Advances a governance framework in South African universities, suggesting new practices for enhanced legitimacy and adaptability.
South African public universities face converging pressures that compliance-based, managerial, and structural approaches to governance cannot meet. Historical redress, ideological contestation, global anti-DEI currents, and the legacies of cooperative governance arrangements that too often operate symbolically have exposed the limits of prevailing frameworks. This paper advances a conceptual contribution to governance theory by integrating three frameworks: Heracleous and Lan’s (2022) “Third Possibility,” which reframes the purpose of governance as stewardship grounded in socioemotional wealth, long-term legacy, and societal embeddedness; Complexity Theory, which supplies the orientation through which universities are understood as complex adaptive systems requiring adaptive rather than controlling governance; and the King V Code of Corporate Governance in South Africa, which provides the practice architecture through its apply-and-explain regime and outcomes-based logic. Held together, these frameworks combine to produce a reframing of governance as social relations work : the ongoing, relational enactment of authority, participation, and legitimacy within institutional life. The paper illustrates the integrated model across three governance domains – stewardship of institutional culture and symbolic life, cooperative governance architecture, and the role of the state – and engages the barriers such reform must confront. It translates the model into four interlinked recommendations: a national governance charter, complexity-informed leadership development, socioemotional wealth mapping, and metrics that measure influence rather than representation. Although South Africa is the empirical setting, the integrated model travels, offering scholars and practitioners a vocabulary for rethinking governance in public institutions facing volatility, politicisation, and crises of legitimacy worldwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergsteedt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: