Develops soft sensor models to improve biomass estimation in industrial yeast fermentations, indicating better monitoring techniques are needed.
Accurate biomass monitoring remains a bottleneck in industrial fermentation, where conventional offline methods, gravimetric dry cell weight (DCW) and spectrophotometric optical density at 600 nm (OD 600 ), are incompatible with real‐time process control. Online optical probes operating at 860 nm (OD 860 ) provide continuous, non‐invasive monitoring, but their signals become increasingly nonlinear due to multiple light scattering, limiting direct interpretation without mathematical transformation. This study develops and validates interpretable soft sensor regression models that convert nonlinear OD 860 signals into DCW and OD 600 across three industrially relevant yeast species, Pichia pastoris , Kluyveromyces marxianus , and Yarrowia lipolytica . Fed‐batch datasets from 19 independent batches were used to evaluate 14 candidate models, including nonlinear and spline‐based functions. Model performance was assessed by the nested leave‐one‐batch‐out cross‐validation (LOBO‐CV) to prevent information leakage from batch‐correlated data. Model selection followed a parsimony criterion, retaining the simplest model within 5% of the minimum cross‐validated RMSE. For DCW prediction, selected models achieved cross‐validated coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) of 0.85–0.91 across species; OD 600 predictions were less accurate ( R 2 CV = 0.49 – 0.90), reflecting dilution‐driven noise amplification inherent to high‐density spectrophotometric measurements. A dual‐model strategy is presented, pairing software‐optimized implementations with simplified piecewise‐linear equations suitable for calculator‐based deployment in industrial environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hierro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: