Scoping review shows the role of Indigenous knowledge in health and biodiversity for the Tenetehara Tembé, highlighting further research needs.
Background Indigenous knowledge systems are deeply entangled with territorial stewardship and everyday health practices in the Amazon, yet this evidence is scattered across disciplines and often poorly indexed. Methods We conducted a scoping review. A primary database search (SciELO, LILACS, BDTD, CAPES Portal, PubMed, Scopus and the ISA repository; August–September 2025) combined controlled and free‑text terms for Indigenous peoples, traditional knowledge, health/care, medicinal plants and biodiversity/territory. To address sensitivity and known indexing gaps, we added supplementary targeted searches for the Tenetehara Tembé / Alto Rio Guamá Indigenous Territory and performed backward citation tracking (December 2025). Results The primary search retrieved 80 records; 5 evidence sources met the inclusion criteria. Supplementary searches added 5 additional eligible sources, totaling 10 included sources. Evidence converges on (i) intermedicality and medicinal‑plant use as part of biocultural identity, (ii) territory and forest integrity as determinants of Indigenous health, and (iii) legal‑ethical imperatives for equitable benefit‑sharing and Indigenous authorship in knowledge-based interventions. Evidence specific to the Alto Rio Guamá territory exists but remains limited and concentrated in the social sciences and nursing, signaling a disciplinary and indexing gap rather than an absolute absence of research. Conclusions Integrating Indigenous knowledge into public health and biodiversity policies requires intercultural governance, protection of land rights, and research designs led with Indigenous participation. For the Tenetehara Tembé, priority research needs include community‑defined health outcomes, participatory ethnobotany, and environmental‑health monitoring aligned with local territorial projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: