Cognitive metaphor theory uncovers metaphor's role in Kafka's narrative, challenging previous ideas about his work.
Applying cognitive metaphor theory to a reading of Franz Kafka's first great story “The Judgment” fills a lacuna in the long tradition of scholarship on the role of metaphor in Kafka's work. Cognitive analysis of the text reveals a liberal and effective use of everyday basic linguistic metaphor on the part of the narrator alongside a striking discrepancy in metaphorical facility between the story's two protagonists, findings with important implications. Further, each critical juncture of the narrative — the turning point, the climax, and the denouement — foregrounds metaphor in unique and fascinating ways. In light of the text's genesis — composed over the course of eight hours one night in September 1912 — these findings indicate, contra received wisdom that the author had an “aversion” to metaphor, an intuitive appreciation of the power and truth of metaphor as elucidated by contemporary cognitive science.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Huffmaster (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: