Discussion examines the impact of border externalization on migrant vulnerability, suggesting policy implications.
This paper seeks to discuss the practice of border externalization as a policy that transfers migration control beyond national geographic boundaries and has become a growing trend among countries that receive large flows of people, whether voluntary or forced. The analysis is based on the premise that this strategy does not, in itself, necessarily constitute a violation of human rights; however, in most cases, it ends up assuming a xenophobic stance, potentially placing migrants in situations of increased vulnerability. To this end, the main research method employed was documentary analysis, presenting the conceptualization of this practice and examining a practical example based on the actions taken by the United States during the first term of Donald Trump.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amanda Nascimento Balestrini (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: