Review determines tobramycin concentration targets for efficacy and toxicity in cystic fibrosis, suggesting AUC-guided dosing.
Intravenous tobramycin is a first‐line treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Tobramycin exhibits concentration‐dependent activity; however, excess drug exposure can lead to nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. While dosing typically targets serum peak (C max ) and trough (C min ) concentrations, the area under the concentration–time curve over 24 h (AUC 24 ) is also used to guide therapy. However, optimal exposure targets remain unclear, leading to variability in clinical practice and guidelines. This review aimed to determine the target tobramycin concentrations and exposure (C max , C min , AUC 24 ) associated with clinical efficacy (lung function improvement) and/or toxicity (nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity) in CF. Four databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane) were searched and identified studies involving CF patients receiving intravenous tobramycin, recorded tobramycin drug concentration/exposure alongside either clinical efficacy or drug‐related toxicity outcomes. Studies with ≤10 patients, in vitro studies and reviews were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. A meta‐analysis was not conducted. Twenty‐six studies were included; efficacy was reported in 17, nephrotoxicity in 16 and ototoxicity in 17. Both C max and AUC 24 were associated with efficacy, with AUC 24 being the more reliable predictor. C min and AUC 24 were associated with toxicity. Only 11 studies reported AUC 24 , and the overall quality of evidence was poor (21 with medium/high risk of bias, 5 low bias). Current therapeutic C max (20–40 mg/L) and C min (<1 mg/L) targets remain appropriate. Evidence suggests AUC 24 ‐guided dosing for improved efficacy and safety; however, further research is needed to confirm the optimal AUC 24 target (80–120 mg/L·h).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harwood et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: