In the face of the regulatory failure problem caused by blockchain hidden addresses, existing solutions often fall into a dilemma where 'privacy protection' and 'compliance review' are either one or the other.This paper proposes an innovative integration framework that transforms the behavioural elements in anti-money laundering and other legal provisions (such as 'high-frequency and small-scale transactions') into computable logic.Based on zero-knowledge proof technology, it generates verifiable credentials to determine whether the transaction behaviour is compliant without revealing the true identity of the address.Experiments on a public blockchain transaction dataset (elliptic) show that this framework achieves an average improvement of over 15% in core identification performance compared to traditional non-private rule-based methods, while maintaining an acceptable performance overhead.As a proof-of-concept validation conducted on a transparent dataset with simulated concealment, the actual performance may differ in native privacy-preserving chains.This research provides a new approach that combines legal rigor with technical feasibility for achieving effective on-chain behaviour supervision while protecting user privacy.
Ji et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: