Randomized trial tests magic numbers in nuclear data, indicating strong closure signals across mass regimes.
This paper tests whether standard nuclear magic numbers appear as finite-response closure peaks in AME2020 binding-energy data. Using two-neutron and two-proton separation-energy discontinuities, the analysis finds robust magic-minus-non-magic shell-gap lifts across cleaning choices and mass regimes. After excluding the lightest nuclei, positive neutron and proton closure signals remain and most of the standard magic-number sequence is recovered by direct shell-gap ranking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adam Sheldrick (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: