Scholarly research examines frontiers in colonial and postcolonial contexts, revealing complexities in their meanings and implications.
Scholarly research on frontiers has exploded over the last two or three decades. ‘Frontier’ is a word with a long history, and shifting meanings with complex relations to settler colonialism, imperialism, and capitalism. As a geographical keyword, the frontier has been put to work to understand a variety of colonial and postcolonial settings in which new commodity frontiers – land-based, oceanic, outer-space – have arisen. But the explosion of frontier talk is marked by conceptual elasticity, contradictory meanings, and a lack of precision. We ask: what makes a frontier a frontier? A frontier, we argue, marks a conjuncture, a particular moment in state time where the social and spatial outside is transformed into the inside of state and capital. The frontier is a form of social space where ‘the edge of the sword’, understood as a threshold at the limits of state capacity, articulates a liminal condition of authority, state, and capital that brings about the painful birth (and rebirth) of territory at the margins or edges of states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korf et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: