Scoping review describes women-focused workplace health promotion programs and their health outcomes, implying a need for more rigorous studies.
Background The World Health Organization and the International Labour Organization consider the workplace ideal for promoting workers' health and well‐being. Objectives To describe workplace health promotion programs for women implemented in or through the workplace, and to synthesize the health‐related outcomes reported in these studies. Search Strategy Research from the last 10 years (2014–2024) in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Selection Criteria We included primary empirical studies evaluating workplace health promotion programs for adult women, using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods approaches, including experimental and quasi‐experimental studies. Data Collection/Analysis Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, as well as full texts, extracted data on study and intervention characteristics and health‐related outcomes, and synthesized findings narratively. Results Of 183 records identified, 10 met the eligibility criteria. Programs were grouped into three domains: (1) mental health and stress reduction, (2) lifestyle behaviors and chronic disease prevention, and (3) maternal and reproductive health. Favorable outcomes were identified in most studies, often based on self‐reported measures, including improved well‐being/work–life balance, increased physical activity or fitness, enhanced social support, and continued breastfeeding when support rooms were available. Conclusion Workplace health promotion programs for women report promising outcomes, but the evidence base is limited and heterogeneous. More rigorous, well‐designed interventions tailored to women's multiple roles and life stages, ideally with comparison groups and longer follow‐up, are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebben et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: