Assesses aerosol containment in patients during aerosol-generating procedures, implying potential safety in clinical settings.
Aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) expose healthcare personnel to airborne pathogens and require portable engineering controls that can be integrated into routine clinical workflows. We developed a portable, foldable negative-pressure aerosol-containment system (FNPACS) combining adaptive fan control, an H14 high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter, and a disposable metal-oxide prefilter in a mobile filtration module. Bench performance was evaluated using pressure-flow testing in accordance with National Environmental Balancing Bureau (NEBB) procedures and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14644-3, polyalphaolefin aerosol challenge testing, and smoke visualization, while an exploratory clinical study assessed environmental contamination via real-time reverse-transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) in 11 patients (31 assay analyses). Bench testing demonstrated HEPA filtration efficiencies of 99.994–99.997%, stable negative-pressure generation across fan duty cycles, no detectable downstream breakthrough beyond the HEPA filter under the tested conditions, and effective inward airflow on smoke testing. A Lagrangian discrete phase model (DPM) particle-tracking simulation further characterized size-dependent aerosol-surrogate transport. Under HEPA-ON active-extraction conditions, 73.0–86.1% of simulated 0.3–10 µm water-equivalent particles were transported to the HEPA suction pathway, while 13.9–27.0% were deposited on internal wall surfaces. In the clinical evaluation, SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection on environmental swabs was limited and predominantly low level. The clearest reproducible signal occurred on the top interior surface under HEPA-OFF conditions, whereas HEPA-ON detections were isolated or presumptive high-Ct signals without reproducible confirmation. These findings provide preliminary engineering and usability support for FNPACS as a feasible near-source aerosol-control platform for AGPs. The patient swab component should be interpreted as an exploratory, proof-of-concept assessment rather than confirmatory evidence of clinical containment efficiency because several clinical cases had non-supportive patient-related controls and were therefore not used in the primary containment interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: