Demonstrates safe bone lesion classification in radiographs, suggesting a valuable tool for diagnosis.
Background/Objectives: Accurate bone lesion classification on radiographs is critical for clinical decision-making and forensic identification. Existing deep learning approaches treat radiographs as whole images, neglecting available spatial annotations and clinical metadata. To develop an ROI-guided deep learning framework integrating clinical metadata for three-class (Normal, Benign, Malignant) bone lesion classification and to assess its clinical safety profile. Methods: Using the BTXRD (3746 radiographs: 1879 Normal, 1525 Benign, 342 Malignant), an EfficientNetV2-S backbone was combined with an 11-dimensional metadata MLP trained on ROI-cropped regions. Training employed Focal Loss with adaptive class weighting, Mixup/CutMix augmentations, Stochastic Weight Averaging, and Test-Time Augmentation. Five-fold stratified cross-validation with bootstrap confidence intervals (n = 2000) and probability calibration metrics were used. Results: The framework achieved 96.05% accuracy (95% CI: 95.41–96.66%), 93.94% balanced accuracy, 92.62% macro F1-score, and 99.21% macro-AUC (95% CI: 98.89–99.42%). Critically, near-zero Malignant-to-Normal misclassifications occurred (1/342, 0.29%; 95% Clopper–Pearson CI: 0.01–1.62%) across all 3746 predictions. The minority Malignant class attained F1 = 83.53% despite comprising only 9.1% of the dataset. Conclusions: ROI-guided deep learning with metadata fusion achieves state-of-the-art bone lesion classification with clinically safe error patterns and probability outputs whose calibration was explicitly quantified, supporting its potential as a decision support tool in diagnostic radiology and forensic anthropology, pending external validation on independent cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ocak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: