Evaluates rockburst identification in small datasets, suggesting improved safety measures.
Rockburst is a major dynamic hazard in deep underground engineering. However, field case-history datasets are often constrained by small sample sizes, multi-source heterogeneity, feature redundancy, anomalous observations, and severe class imbalance, which may reduce the reliability of machine-learning models, particularly for high-risk rockburst identification. To address these challenges, this study proposes a reproducible preprocessing and evaluation framework that integrates interaction-feature construction and selection, radial basis function kernel principal component analysis, Isolation Forest-based outlier screening, and BorderlineSMOTE-ENN boundary-aware rebalancing. Based on 248 published rockburst cases, six ensemble classifiers, namely AdaBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, GradientBoosting, ExtraTrees, and Random Forest, were evaluated using nested cross-validation combined with Bayesian optimization. In addition to accuracy, balanced accuracy, and macro-F1, safety-oriented indicators for Strong rockburst events, including the missed detection rate and false alarm rate, were reported. The proposed framework improved both overall and class-balanced performance on the present dataset compared with the baseline strategy. ExtraTrees achieved the best overall performance, with an accuracy of 99.00%, balanced accuracy of 99.17%, macro-F1 of 99.00%, Strong-rockburst missed detection rate of 3.33%, and false alarm rate of 0.00%. Ablation analysis showed that BorderlineSMOTE-ENN made the largest contribution to minority-class recognition, while Isolation Forest improved model robustness and KPCA provided a model-dependent nonlinear representation. Overall, the proposed framework provides a reproducible and safety-oriented preprocessing strategy for rockburst intensity classification in small, heterogeneous, and imbalanced datasets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: