Case report explores nursing support and Morita therapy to improve social reintegration in hikikomori youth.
Background and Clinical Significance: “Hikikomori”—a state of prolonged social withdrawal affecting an estimated 2% of Japan’s working-age population—is frequently associated with underlying anxiety disorders, such as gaze phobia, and contributes to the socio-economic burden known as the “8050 problem,” in which aging parents support their socially isolated adult children. While Morita therapy is effective for such conditions, nursing support has historically lacked a systematic theoretical framework. This case report presents a novel nursing model analyzing the transformation process from toraware (mental preoccupation) toward mokuteki-hon-i (purpose-driven action). It proposes the ‘side-by-side’ nursing approach as a potentially important element in supporting patient autonomy in similar clinical settings. Case Presentation: A man in his 20s, diagnosed with gaze phobia and experiencing long-term withdrawal following traumatic bullying, was referred to our specialized short-care program. After initial preparation through structured psychoeducation regarding Morita therapy principles (toraware, sei-no-yokubo, mokuteki-hon-i), he participated in a 14-month Morita therapy-based short-care program combining individual and group interventions. Initially, the patient exhibited severe social avoidance and was trapped in a cycle of seishin-kogo-sayo (psychic interaction). Nurses applied ‘Strategic Inattention to Symptoms’ (shojo-fumon) and provided specific role suggestions, such as serving as a secretary in group discussions, to elicit his sei-no-yokubo (desire for life). Through the reframing of his anxiety as a constructive drive, the patient shifted to a purpose-driven stance. Outcomes showed improved self-adjustment skills in public spaces and successful social reintegration through sustained part-time employment. Conclusions: Nursing care characterized by ‘intentional non-intervention’—which involves waiting in a ‘side-by-side’ manner within a minimally structured environment—may contribute to fostering patient autonomy in similar clinical contexts. This ‘experience-oriented’ approach appeared to elicit inner strengths and support self-regulation in this case, warranting further investigation in multi-case designs. The relative contributions of individual nursing support and group therapeutic milieu cannot be disentangled in a single-case design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebihara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: