Retrospective trial evaluates adaptive complex signal average imaging to improve liver imaging outcomes, suggesting better signal improvements in breath-hold scenarios.
Objectives: This study evaluated the utility of adaptive complex signal average (ACSA) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) specifically in breath-hold (BH) liver imaging, with a focus on signal intensity (SI) improvement, intrahepatic signal homogeneity, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) behavior, and compared these findings with conventional non-ACSA DWI and free-breathing (FB) ACSA DWI. Methods: This retrospective study included 62 patients (mean age, 67.8 ± 13.6 years; 27 women) who underwent liver MRI with both FB and BH DWI on a 3-T system. Non-ACSA images were generated using conventional magnitude reconstruction, and ACSA images were reconstructed from identical raw data. SI, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and ADC were measured in the left lateral segment and right hepatic lobe. The signal intensity difference ratio (SIDR) between ACSA and non-ACSA, signal intensity ratio (SIR) and ADC ratio between right lobe and lateral segment were calculated. Results: In both FB and BH imaging, SI and SNR in both liver regions were significantly higher on ACSA DWI than on non-ACSA DWI (p < 0.01). ADC values were significantly lower with ACSA. SIDR was significantly higher in the left lateral segment (p < 0.01), indicating greater SI improvement in motion-prone regions. SIR and ADC ratios between lobes were significantly smaller with ACSA in both respiratory conditions (p < 0.01). FB-ACSA showed smaller SIR than BH-ACSA, while ADC ratios did not differ. Conclusions: ACSA DWI significantly improves SI, intrahepatic uniformity, and ADC reliability even under BH liver imaging. BH ACSA DWI may represent a potentially useful application complementary to FB ACSA DWI, supporting its consideration as a post-processing strategy for improving qualitative and quantitative liver DWI in future investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanabe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: