Examines perceived closeness and its associations with developmental outcomes in preadolescents, suggesting relevance for interventions.
Relationships are a fundamental foundation of human development, shaping developmental trajectories, well-being, and health, yet their psychological assessment remains challenging. Youths’ perceived closeness to others has been linked to a range of prosocial outcomes but has been less extensively examined in research studying problematic developmental outcomes, such as conduct problems. Further, most studies have focused on a single relationship, which ignores the potential importance of determining the extent to which youth’s perceptions of closeness extend beyond immediate social groups. The present study addressed these gaps by examining the factor structure and construct validity of an expanded measure of perceived closeness that includes a broader range of relationships, labeled the Perceived Closeness to Others Questionnaire (PCtO). A sample of 426 middle school students (216 girls; M age = 12.90 (0.91) years) was recruited and completed a visual measure of perceived closeness that utilizes visual images of pairs of circles (i.e., one indicating “the Self” and one indicating “the Other”) at different distances (i.e., from very far away to almost completely overlapping) to indicate how close they feel to others. Participants also completed self-report measures assessing a range of prosocial and problematic outcomes. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) suggested that, despite assessing a wide range of relationships, the measure seemed to be capturing a unidimensional construct. Further, scores from the measure showed adequate reliability and were positively correlated with all the measures of prosocial outcomes and with all but one measure of problematic outcomes (i.e., conduct problems). Overall, the findings provide initial support for a measure of psychological closeness suitable for use in research with youth. This tool may help advance theories of prosocial and antisocial development and guide interventions aimed at enhancing youths’ relationships with others.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Facci et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: