Reveals key predictors of productivity in undergraduates, suggesting data-driven support frameworks.
Student productivity is shaped by a complex interaction of psychological, academic, environmental, physical, and social factors. This study investigates the key determinants affecting productivity among 18–21-year-old undergraduates, using a dataset of 843 responses collected via Google Forms on a 5-point Likert scale. Multiple Linear Regression (R² = 0.2395, F = 88.08, p < 0.001) identified rapid heartbeat, anxiety, and academic conflict as primary stress drivers. Machine learning classifiers — Random Forest, XGBoost, Logistic Regression, Association Rule Mining, and K-Means Clustering — were applied to classify students by productivity level. XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (90.5%, AUC = 0.976), with workload overwhelm, low academic confidence, and poor concentration emerging as the three strongest predictors. Approximately 29% of students were flagged as at-risk. Findings support the development of data-driven, early-warning academic support frameworks. The findings highlight the multidimensional nature of personal productivity and identify the importance of emotional well-being and academic environment management. This study describe the usefulness of statistical and machine learning approaches in understanding and predicting productivity patterns among students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khajekar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: