This dataset introduces 800 videos with diverse types of AI-generated content, facilitating analysis of deepfake detection methods.
The expanding capabilities of deep learning-based media synthesis have intensified concerns regarding the authenticity of digital content and the reliability of forensic analysis tools. In response to these challenges, this work introduces DeepFakeX, a collection of 800 synthetically generated videos available under controlled access for research purposes. The dataset encompasses four distinct categories of AI-driven synthesis: facial identity replacement, audio track substitution, neural voice cloning, and combined audiovisual alteration. Unlike existing deepfake datasets that predominantly focus on facial synthesis, DeepFakeX covers a broader range of manipulation modalities, reflecting the diversity of synthetic media encountered in real-world settings. All deepfakes were generated using state-of-the-art, publicly available tools. Standardized post-processing procedures were applied to each video to ensure uniformity in terms of quality, duration and encoding format. DeepFakeX also emphasizes diversity in gender, age, ethnicity, and language. Video contexts span speeches, informational videos, movie clips, news broadcasts, and interviews that reflect content scenarios commonly encountered in real-world online environments. The dataset includes videos in both English and Urdu. The dataset’s quality and structural variability were assessed through visual and audio analyses using the Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The evaluation results revealed substantial variability within each manipulation category, along with clearly distinguishable patterns specific to each modality. DeepFakeX has been developed to facilitate rigorous and transparent research in deepfake detection, cross-modal forensic analysis, and AI-driven media forensics. It is hosted on Zenodo under controlled access for research use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: