Exploratory study compares swimming performance in double-arm backstroke versus front crawl among Para and non-disabled swimmers, revealing significant differences in efficiency and technique.
This exploratory study compares the Froude efficiency (ηF), intra-cyclic speed fluctuation (ICSF) and other performance determinants between two freestyle swimming techniques: double-arm backstroke and front crawl, and then demonstrates how Para swimmers with hypertonia differ from non-disabled swimmers when performing double-arm backstroke. Three-dimensional motion analysis was undertaken on three Para swimmers with hypertonia (sport classes 3–4) and eight non-disabled swimmers performing a simulated double-arm backstroke with lower limbs immobile. The non-disabled group also completed front crawl trials. Swimming speed, stroke frequency, stroke length and ηF were significantly greater, and ICSF significantly lower, during front crawl than during double-arm backstroke in non-disabled swimmers. Para swimmers’ double-arm backstroke speed was 45–52% that of the non-disabled group; their stroke length was 58–69% shorter and stroke frequency 26–53% higher. Non-disabled swimmers demonstrated higher peak elbow extension velocity during the push phase than Para swimmers (6.36 ± 1.26 rad∙s−1 vs. 1.50–1.81 rad∙s−1) and their ηF was approximately double the Para swimmers’ (0.33 ± 0.02 vs. 0.14–0.18). Para swimmers displayed poorer body alignment than the non-disabled group; ICSF did not differ between groups. Double-arm backstroke is slower and less efficient than front crawl. Hypertonia may reduce the efficiency of double-arm backstroke by diminishing propulsive movements and worsening body orientation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: