Randomized trial demonstrates enhanced diagnostic accuracy and stability in nuclear power systems, indicating improved safety measures.
Failures in critical systems and equipment within nuclear power plants (NPPs) significantly threaten operational safety and reliability. Therefore, rapid and accurate root cause localization during the incipient stages of failure is critical to preventing escalation. Traditional modeling methods often fail to address the inherent structural complexity of NPPs, the diversity of failure modes, and the stochastic mapping relationships between symptoms and causes. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an intelligent fault diagnosis framework integrating knowledge graphs (KGs) and Bayesian networks (BNs). First, by analyzing failure modes and anomaly characteristics, we define discrimination criteria for typical faults. Second, a structured knowledge modeling approach is developed to transform unstructured fault information into a KG, which is subsequently mapped to a BN topology. Finally, to mitigate the subjectivity of expert priors, data-driven structure and parameter learning algorithms are employed to optimize the model, enhancing inference accuracy. Robustness was validated through experiments targeting three fault severity levels, using signed directed graphs (SDGs), support vector machines (SVMs), domain generalization softmax (DG-softmax) and long short-term memory (LSTM) as benchmarks. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method maintains high diagnostic precision across varying severities, outperforming traditional data-driven methods in accuracy and stability. This study enhances the interpretability and engineering applicability of intelligent diagnosis in nuclear power systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: