Randomized trial investigates UAV and satellite images for rice growth monitoring and fertilization decisions, suggesting improved crop management practices.
Above-ground biomass (AGB) is a critical indicator for evaluating crop growth, with its large-scale monitoring being fundamental to precision agriculture. To improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of large-scale farmland monitoring, this study developed an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)–satellite collaborative inversion framework. The data, including rice AGB, UAV imagery, and satellite imagery, were collected in 2024. The proposed Distance-Correlation–Correlation-Feature-Selection (DC-CFS) algorithm was employed to select compact feature subsets for each growth stage. Subsequently, six machine learning models were compared to identify the optimal UAV-scale inversion model for each specific stage. Then, the AGB values simulated by the UAV-scale model were used to train the satellite-scale inversion model. A paddy field mask covering the entire district was generated using Segment Anything Model (SAM) and the temporal spectral variation pattern of rice, enabling county-scale AGB mapping. Research results indicate that the DC-CFS algorithm can effectively select a small number of low-redundancy features for each growth stage. The optimal UAV scale model type varies dynamically with growth stages, with ExtraTrees demonstrating overall superior performance. Except for the heading stage, the R2 of the models remained above 0.69. Furthermore, the BayesianRidge algorithm also presents a viable and competitive alternative when computational efficiency is a consideration. At the satellite scale, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Extremely Randomized Trees (ExtraTrees) were identified as the optimal models for rice AGB estimation due to their stable performance across all stages, with R2 values consistently above 0.74. Finally, rice growth classification maps and corresponding fertilization recommendations were generated based on the satellite-scale inversion results, providing technical support for precision agriculture practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: