Key result
Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus low-dose aspirin was associated with a lower risk of MACE compared with clopidogrel plus aspirin (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.98).
Why the study?
Randomized trial evidence evaluating combination anticoagulant or P2Y12 inhibitor plus low-dose aspirin versus low-dose aspirin alone needed to be identified, summarized, and quantified in patients with stable CAD and/or PAD.
Does rivaroxaban plus low-dose aspirin reduce MACE compared to clopidogrel plus low-dose aspirin in adult patients with chronic CAD and/or PAD?
Systematic Review
Does rivaroxaban plus low-dose aspirin reduce MACE compared to clopidogrel plus low-dose aspirin in adult patients with chronic CAD and/or PAD?
Hazard Ratio: 0.82 (95% CI 0.68–0.98)
In an indirect treatment comparison, rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus low-dose aspirin reduced MACE, CV death, and stroke compared to clopidogrel plus low-dose aspirin in patients with chronic CAD or PAD, without increasing major bleeding.
May support rivaroxaban-aspirin preference over clopidogrel-aspirin for MACE reduction in CAD/PAD; extends indirect RCT evidence but leaves direct comparisons open.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison (ITC) to identify, summarize and quantify randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence evaluating combination anticoagulant or P2Y12 inhibitor with low-dose aspirin versus low-dose aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: We performed an updated search of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE through 23 August 2021 to identify RCTs of adult patients with chronic CAD and/or PAD that compared combination anticoagulant or P2Y12 inhibitor with low-dose aspirin to low-dose aspirin alone. Outcomes of interest included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI) and bleeding. When needed, outcomes were pooled using random-effects models to generate hazard or risk ratios (HRs or RRs) and accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Adjusted ITCs using subsequent pooled HRs/RRs were then performed. RESULTS: Six publications reporting the results of two unique RCTs (one evaluating clopidogrel + aspirin vs. aspirin alone and the other rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily + aspirin vs. aspirin alone) were analyzed. The ITC suggested that rivaroxaban + aspirin was associated with a lower risk of MACEs compared with clopidogrel + aspirin (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.68-0.98). When looking at the individual components of MACE, rivaroxaban + aspirin was associated with lower risk of cardiovascular death (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.57-0.98) and stroke (RR = 0.67, 95 CI = 0.49-0.93) and similar risk of MI (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.70-1.23) versus clopidogrel + aspirin. No evidence of a difference in moderate-to-severe bleeding, fatal bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was seen between the two treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to clopidogrel + low-dose aspirin, the use of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily + low-dose aspirin reduced the risk of MACE, CV death and stroke including ischemic stroke in patients with or at high risk for chronic CAD and/or PAD. These benefits of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily + low-dose aspirin compared to clopidogrel + low-dose aspirin appear to be achieved without significantly increasing patients' risk of moderate-to-severe bleeding, including ICH or fatal bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coleman et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD). Rivaroxaban + low-dose aspirin vs. Clopidogrel + low-dose aspirin was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.98). Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus low-dose aspirin was associated with a lower risk of MACE compared with clopidogrel plus aspirin (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: