Key result
Intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients with a genetic risk score ≥2 was associated with a threefold increase in cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.08; 95% CI 1.82-5.21).
Why the study?
Does a genetic risk score predict cardiovascular mortality in response to intensive glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=5,782)
Does a genetic risk score predict cardiovascular mortality in response to intensive glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 3.08 (95% CI 1.82–5.21)
A two-variant genetic risk score can identify patients with type 2 diabetes who may experience increased cardiovascular mortality or derive benefit from intensive glycemic control.
May warrant caution with intensive control in high-GRS type 2 diabetes; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: To identify genetic determinants of increased cardiovascular mortality among subjects with type 2 diabetes who underwent intensive glycemic therapy in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 6.8 million common variants were analyzed for genome-wide association with cardiovascular mortality among 2,667 self-reported white subjects in the ACCORD intensive treatment arm. Significant loci were examined in the entire ACCORD white genetic dataset (n = 5,360) for their modulation of cardiovascular responses to glycemic treatment assignment and in a Joslin Clinic cohort (n = 422) for their interaction with long-term glycemic control on cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: , respectively). A genetic risk score (GRS) defined by the two variants was a significant modulator of cardiovascular mortality response to treatment assignment in the entire ACCORD white genetic dataset. Participants with GRS = 0 experienced a fourfold reduction in cardiovascular mortality in response to intensive treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.24 [95% CI 0.07-0.86]), those with GRS = 1 experienced no difference (HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.54-1.56]), and those with GRS ≥2 experienced a threefold increase (HR 3.08 [95% CI 1.82-5.21]). The modulatory effect of the GRS on the association between glycemic control and cardiovascular mortality was confirmed in the Joslin cohort (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Two genetic variants predict the cardiovascular effects of intensive glycemic control in ACCORD. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these findings can be translated into new strategies to prevent cardiovascular complications of diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=5,782). Intensive glycemic control vs. Standard treatment was evaluated on Cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.82-5.21). Intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients with a genetic risk score ≥2 was associated with a threefold increase in cardiovascular mortality (HR 3.08; 95% CI 1.82-5.21).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: