Key result
A weighted genetic risk score for coronary artery disease was associated with an increased risk of major CAD events in patients with type 2 diabetes (HR per SD 1.27; 95% CI 1.18-1.37).
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the growing number of CAD genetic loci identified in the general population could predict major CAD events in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk.
Does a genetic risk score based on CAD loci identified in the general population improve the prediction of major CAD events in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=7,291)
Yes
Does a genetic risk score based on CAD loci identified in the general population improve the prediction of major CAD events in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.27 (95% CI 1.18–1.37)
p-value: p=4 3 10210
A genetic risk score based on CAD loci from the general population significantly improves the prediction of major CAD events in patients with type 2 diabetes beyond classic clinical predictors.
Supports CAD genetic risk stratification in T2D; leaves open validation for management or outcomes.
OBJECTIVE We evaluated whether the increasing number of genetic loci for coronary artery disease (CAD) identified in the general population could be used to predict the risk of major CAD events (MCE) among participants with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A weighted genetic risk score (GRS) derived from 204 variants representative of all the 160 CAD loci identified in the general population as of December 2017 was calculated in 5,360 and 1,931 white participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) and Outcome Reduction With Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) studies, respectively. The association between GRS and MCE (combining fatal CAD events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) was assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS The GRS was associated with MCE risk in both ACCORD and ORIGIN (hazard ratio [HR] per SD 1.27, 95% CI 1.18–1.37, P = 4 3 10210, and HR per SD 1.35, 95% CI 1.16–1.58, P = 2 3 1024, respectively). This association was independent from interventions tested in the trials and persisted, though attenuated, after adjustment for classic cardiovascular risk predictors. Adding the GRS to clinical predictors improved incident MCE risk classification (relative integrated discrimination improvement +8%, P = 7 3 1024). The performance of this GRS was superior to that of GRS based on the smaller number of CAD loci available in previous years. CONCLUSIONS When combined into a GRS, CAD loci identified in the general population are associated with CAD also in type 2 diabetes. This GRS provides a significant improvement in the ability to correctly predict future MCE, which may increase further with the discovery of new CAD loci.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kraft et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk (n=7,291). Weighted genetic risk score (GRS) for coronary artery disease vs. Lower genetic risk score was evaluated on Major CAD events (combining fatal CAD events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.18-1.37, p=4 3 10210). A weighted genetic risk score for coronary artery disease was associated with an increased risk of major CAD events in patients with type 2 diabetes (HR per SD 1.27; 95% CI 1.18-1.37).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: