Key result
Adding a weighted genetic risk score to traditional predictors improves MACE discrimination in CAD patients.
Why the study?
The predictive value of genetic information on the recurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease patients remains controversial.
Does a weighted genetic risk score improve the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=1,587)
Does a weighted genetic risk score improve the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease?
p-value: p=0.0003
The addition of a weighted genetic risk score to traditional clinical risk factors modestly but significantly improves the prediction and reclassification of MACE in patients with coronary artery disease.
GRS may refine CAD risk stratification; leaves open whether it predicts MACE recurrence beyond traditional factors in observational cohorts.
The inclusion of a genetic risk score (GRS) can modify the risk prediction of coronary artery disease (CAD), providing an advantage over the use of traditional models. The predictive value of the genetic information on the recurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains controversial. A total of 33 genetic variants previously associated with CAD were genotyped in 1587 CAD patients from the GENEMACOR study. Of these, 18 variants presented an hazard ratio >1, so they were selected to construct a weighted GRS (wGRS). MACE discrimination and reclassification were evaluated by C-Statistic, Net Reclassification Index and Integrated Discrimination Improvement methodologies. After the addition of wGRS to traditional predictors, the C-index increased from 0.566 to 0.572 (p=0.0003). Subsequently, adding wGRS to traditional plus clinical risk factors, this model slightly improved from 0.620 to 0.622 but with statistical significance (p=0.004). NRI showed that 17.9% of the cohort was better reclassified when the primary model was associated with wGRS. The Kaplan-Meier estimator showed that, at 15-year follow-up, the group with a higher number of risk alleles had a significantly higher MACE occurrence (p=0.011). In CAD patients, wGRS improved MACE risk prediction, discrimination and reclassification over the conventional factors, providing better cost-effective therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendonça et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=1,587). Weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) vs. Traditional predictors was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) discrimination (p=0.0003). Adding a weighted genetic risk score to traditional predictors in CAD patients significantly improved MACE risk discrimination (C-index increased from 0.566 to 0.572, p=0.0003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: