Key result
Functional SYNTAX score predicts 1-year MACE more accurately than classic score with 0.68 C-index.
Why the study?
Does the functional SYNTAX score (FSS) predict clinical outcomes better than the classic SYNTAX score (SS) in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=497)
Does the functional SYNTAX score (FSS) predict clinical outcomes better than the classic SYNTAX score (SS) in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recalculating the SYNTAX score by incorporating only ischemia-producing lesions (FFR ≤ 0.80) improves risk discrimination for adverse events in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI.
OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed at investigating whether a fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided SYNTAX score (SS), termed "functional SYNTAX score" (FSS), would predict clinical outcome better than the classic SS in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The SS is a purely anatomic score based on the coronary angiogram and predicts outcome after PCI in patients with multivessel CAD. FFR-guided PCI improves outcomes by adding functional information to the anatomic information obtained from the angiogram. METHODS: The SS was prospectively collected in 497 patients enrolled in the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. FSS was determined by only counting ischemia-producing lesions (FFR ≤ 0.80). The ability of each score to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year was compared. RESULTS: The 497 patients were divided into tertiles of risk based on the SS. After determining the FSS for each patient, 32% moved to a lower-risk group as follows. MACE occurred in 9.0%, 11.3%, and 26.7% of patients in the low-, medium-, and high-FSS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Only FSS and procedure time were independent predictors of 1-year MACE. FSS demonstrated a better predictive accuracy for MACE compared with SS (Harrell's C of FSS, 0.677 vs. SS, 0.630, p = 0.02; integrated discrimination improvement of 1.94%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Recalculating SS by only incorporating ischemia-producing lesions as determined by FFR decreases the number of higher-risk patients and better discriminates risk for adverse events in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nam et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=497). Functional SYNTAX score (FSS) vs. Classic SYNTAX score (SS) was evaluated on Predictive accuracy for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year (Harrell's C 0.677 vs 0.630, p=0.02). The functional SYNTAX score demonstrated better predictive accuracy for 1-year major adverse cardiac events compared with the classic SYNTAX score (Harrell's C 0.677 vs. 0.630, p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: