Retrospective cohort study identifies predictors of respiratory support duration in late preterm infants, indicating new weaning strategies.
Objective To investigate determinants of respiratory support duration and construct an interpretable weaning prediction model for late preterm infants. Methods A retrospective cohort study enrolled 365 late preterm infants (gestational age 34 + 0–36 + 6 weeks). Respiratory support duration (days) was the survival outcome, with successful weaning as the event. After Pearson correlation screening (|r| > 0.75 excluded), LASSO-Cox regression (10-fold cross-validation) selected predictors, followed by multivariable Cox modeling. Discrimination was assessed by C-index and time-dependent AUC at days 3, 5, and 8, with optimism-corrected bootstrap validation. Calibration was evaluated using calibration curves, Brier scores, and decision curve analysis. SHAP analysis quantified feature contributions on the log-hazard scale. Sensitivity analyses verified robustness. Results Multiple pregnancy (HR = 1.289, 95% CI: 1.038–1.601, P = 0.022), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (HR = 1.014, 95% CI: 1.009–1.019, P < 0.001), and albumin-to-globulin ratio (A/G) (HR = 1.130, 95% CI: 1.001–1.275, P = 0.049) were risk factors. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) (HR = 0.703, 95% CI: 0.564–0.878, P = 0.002), lymphocyte percentage (LYM_PC) (HR = 0.987, 95% CI: 0.978–0.997, P = 0.008), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (HR = 0.991, 95% CI: 0.984–0.998, P = 0.013, per 10-unit increase) were protective factors. Pulmonary surfactant showed no association ( P = 0.652). The model achieved a C-index of 0.677 (optimism-corrected 0.661) and td-AUC of 0.732, 0.769, and 0.782 at days 3, 5, and 8. Calibration was acceptable, DCA showed net benefit at day 5, and SHAP identified SOD, NCPAP, and LYM_PC as primary drivers. Conclusion The LASSO-Cox nomogram demonstrated moderate-to-good discrimination. Multiple pregnancy and elevated SOD are warning signs for prolonged oxygen dependency, while early NCPAP can shorten respiratory support. Nomogram visualization with SHAP interpretability provides a transparent basis for individualized weaning assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: