Systematic review examines the impact of workplace ageism on wellbeing among workers aged 50 and older, indicating areas for practice improvement.
Introduction In the context of unprecedented workforce age diversity, workplace ageism is increasingly reported. This review synthesizes empirical evidence on the relationship between workplace ageism and workplace wellbeing among workers aged 50 and older, focusing on how these effects unfold (mediation) and the conditions under which they are amplified or buffered (moderation). Methods A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in major academic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed, among others. Of the 3,378 records identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Results Across studies, ageism showed a consistently negative and statistically significant association with workplace wellbeing outcomes, even though ageism and wellbeing were measured with heterogeneous indicators. Findings also suggest spillover beyond work, for example, via decreases in life satisfaction or subjective wellbeing. Moderation evidence was limited; when tested, social support (supervisor and coworker support) emerged as the only moderator in this association. Mediation evidence was more developed and clustered around three pathways: (1) cognitive processes (e.g., appraisals and rumination); (2) affective processes (e.g., aging anxiety); and (3) job demands–resources mechanisms. Conclusions By clarifying these moderators and mechanisms, the review points to leverage points for practices that foster inclusive, intergenerational workplaces and safeguard wellbeing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marrero-Vega et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: