Systematic review evaluates the impact of oral bacterial lysates on asthma control in children, indicating potential benefits.
Background The role of oral bacterial lysates (OBLs) as adjuvant immunomodulatory therapy in pediatric asthma requires clarification. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates their efficacy and safety. Methods We searched eight databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in children comparing standard asthma therapy plus OBLs versus standard therapy/placebo. Primary outcomes were clinical (wheezing/infection frequency, symptom improvement time, treatment efficacy) and lung function parameters. Secondary outcomes included immune biomarkers and adverse events. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Results Twenty-eight RCTs (n = 2,893) were included. Adjunctive OBLs therapy significantly reduced wheezing/exacerbation frequency (Mean Difference (MD) = −3.00,95% confidence intervals (CI): 4.07 to −1.93), shortened symptom improvement time (MD = −3.13 days, 95%CI: 4.10 to −2.15), reduced Respiratory Tract Infection (RTI) frequency (MD = −2.43,95%CI: 3.62 to −1.23) and increased overall treatment efficacy rate (relative rates (RR) = 1.17, 95%CI: 1.13–1.21). Improvements occurred in lung function (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s [FEV1], Forced Vital Capacity [FVC], Peak Expiratory Flow [PEF]) and immune parameters (increased the level of T-lymphocyte subsets (CD3+,CD4+,CD4+/CD8+) and salivary secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), decreased peripheral eosinophil (EOS) count and the level of interleukin-4(IL-4), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Adverse events did not increase significantly (RR = 1.26, 95%CI: 0.93–1.70). Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits across follow-up duration, age, and sample size, with background inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) therapy being a potential effect modifier (P = 0.06). Conclusion Adjunctive OBLs therapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes, lung function, and immune modulation in pediatric asthma, with a favorable safety profile. However, methodological limitations, substantial heterogeneity, and potential biases warrant caution. While promising, more rigorous and long-term trials are needed to define its precise therapeutic role and target population. Systematic Review Registration Identifier CRD420261281796.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: