Investigates CO2 adsorption behavior in high-rank coal, suggesting effective storage potential.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide CO 2 geological sequestration (CCUS) serves as a critical technological pathway to achieve the strategic goal of the “dual-carbon” initiative. Coal seams characterized by dual porosity represent a favorable geological structure for storing carbon dioxide. The adsorption characteristics and storage capacity of CO 2 in the coal seam are the core indexes to evaluate the feasibility of CO 2 injection and storage. Anthracite samples from the south of the Qinshui basin were selected for multi-physical field-coupled CO 2 isothermal adsorption experiments. This study investigates the adsorption behavior of high-rank coal samples toward CO 2, compares the applicability of various theoretical adsorption models, selects the optimal one to build a storage capacity prediction model, and evaluates the CO 2 storage potential of high-rank coal seams. The results indicate that pressure has a positive effect on the adsorption of CO 2 (before reaching the supercritical state), while temperature inhibits the adsorption of CO 2 by coal samples. With the increase in water saturation, the adsorption capacity of coal samples for CO 2 gradually decreases. The theoretical model of micropore filling (the D–A model) has good applicability for predicting the adsorption of CO 2 in coal samples. On the basis of experimental results, estimation models for CO 2 content under different occurrence states and a predictive model for total storage capacity were established. The content of each CO 2 occurrence state is influenced by factors such as formation temperature, pressure, and water saturation. CO 2 is mainly stored in coal reservoirs in the form of adsorption. With increasing burial depth, the proportion of free-state CO 2 shows an increasing trend, while the content of dissolved-state CO 2 exhibits a decreasing trend. The synergistic evolution of three states determines the vertical zoning of the CO 2 storage capacity. These findings advance the understanding of storage mechanisms following CO 2 injection into high-rank coal reservoirs and provide a quantitative method for assessing the feasibility and storage potential of such injections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: