Investigates dynamic behavior of cement-treated sand in vibration-sensitive foundations, suggesting improved assessment methods.
Cement-treated sand is increasingly adopted to improve foundation subgrades for vibration-sensitive rotating machinery; however, its dynamic stiffness and damping are not well quantified across the operating frequency range of turbo-generator systems. This study investigates the frequency-dependent dynamic behaviour of cement-treated sand and translates the resulting properties into a design-oriented vibration-assessment procedure for shallow machine foundations. Cyclic triaxial tests were performed on a natural sand treated with 0–3% Portland cement (by dry sand mass) at a water/cement ratio of 0.6 and cured for 28 days. Specimens were tested at confining stresses of 50, 100, and 200 kPa and cyclic stress ratios of 0.2–1.0 at 1 Hz. Shear modulus and damping ratio were evaluated from medium-strain hysteresis loops. A three-dimensional bonded-contact discrete element model was calibrated against the 1 Hz experimental responses using modulus reduction, damping ratio, loop area, and strain accumulation. The calibrated model was then used to numerically explore frequencies of 1–50 Hz and water/cement ratios of 0.3-1.5 under matched stress states. The combined experimental–numerical database was synthesised into closed-form relations for shear modulus and damping ratio as functions of shear strain, cement content, water/cement ratio, confining pressure, and frequency. The proposed framework is not intended as a new soil–foundation dynamic theory, but as a design-oriented integration of experimentally calibrated and DEM-extended dynamic soil properties into a conventional shallow-foundation vibration assessment procedure. Higher cement content and lower water/cement ratio increased stiffness and reduced damping, while higher frequency produced slightly higher stiffness and lower damping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motlagh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: